The Role of Non-Policy Campaign Cues on Presidential Vote Choice: Are Uninformed Voters More Susceptible to these Messages?
نویسنده
چکیده
Political knowledge is unevenly distributed, and those with the highest amounts are concentrated amongst the politically and socially advantaged. The socioeconomic heterogeneity within the Latino electorate in the United States exemplifies such a distribution. This paper analyzes how political information influences a Latino voter’s use of non-policy campaign messages for the 2000 presidential election. I contend that low-information Latinos will be most influenced by candidates who use non-policy campaign cues, because of their weak priors. In contrast, it is expected that high-information Latinos will be more resistant to non-policy related campaign cues, since their stored levels of political knowledge are high. Findings indicate that low-information Latinos are indeed more likely to use non-policy related cues, relative to high-information Latinos. Such differences in stored political knowledge also affect Latino vote choice, where high-information Latinos behave according to the spatial model of voting, and low-information Latinos do not.
منابع مشابه
An Analysis of the Influence of Radio Political Campaign Messages on Voters’ Electoral Behavior in Kano, Nigeria
This paper will examine the influence of radio political campaign messages on the electorates’ voting behavior in Kano – Nigeria, with a focus on the 2015 general elections. It seeks to ascertain the extent that the electorates in Kano – Nigeria were exposed to radio political campaign messages, as well as the extent to which such messages influenced their voting decisions. Equally, the study c...
متن کاملModeling the effect of campaign advertising on US presidential elections when differences across states matter
We provide a stochastic electoral model of the US Presidential election where candidates take differences across states into account when developing their policy platforms and advertising campaigns. Candidates understand the political and economic differences that exist across states and voters care about candidates’ policies relative to their ideals, about the frequency of candidates’ advertis...
متن کاملPartisan Bias, Political Information and Spatial Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election
This article provides direct estimates of the parameters of spatial utility models of voting using data from the 2008 presidential election. By measuring citizens’ views on issues for which candidates’ stances are known, I estimate voter ideology on the same scale as candidate positions. Using these estimates, I demonstrate that policy exerts a strong influence on vote choice for most voters. W...
متن کاملThe Dilemma of Direct Democracy
The Dilemma of Direct Democracy CRAIG M. BURNETT, ELIZABETH GARRETT & MATHEW D. McCUBBINS The dilemma of direct democracy is that voters may not always be able to make welfareimproving decisions. Lupia’s seminal work has led us to believe that voters can substitute voting cues for substantive policy knowledge. Lupia, however, emphasized that cues were valuable under certain conditions and not o...
متن کاملThe Effect of Priming Racial In-Group Norms of Participation and Racial Group Conflict on Black Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment
This paper examines the effectiveness of racialized Get-Out-The-Vote (GOTV) messages at mobilizing black voters. Here we use a mail-based voter mobilization experiment containing 134,000 black registered voters conducted during 2008 North Carolina Democratic Presidential primary to test two different explanations for how racialized voter mobilization messages might increase black voter turnout ...
متن کامل